Inventory planning · Step 6 · Pressure-test your numbers

Which of my items deserve the most attention?

Not every item is worth the same effort. ABC classification ranks your range by annual value (annual demand times unit cost) and splits it into A, B and C so you put the tightest control on the few items that carry most of the money, and keep the long tail simple. Enter your items below and read the split.

Your result

Where your value is concentrated

Of your 5 items, 1 is Class A, driving 77% of your annual value.

Textbook concentration

Your 5 items carry a total annual value of ₹9,63,600. The 1 Class A item alone accounts for about 77% of that from 20% of your item count: the vital few. The 1 B item covers the next band, and the 3 C items make up the tail.

Recommendation: give the Class A item the tightest control: frequent review, a calculated economic order quantity, and a service-level-based safety stock and reorder point, because an error there ties up the most cash. Order the C items in bulk with a comfortable buffer and do not spend planning time fine-tuning them.

Your items

Add one row per item, with its annual demand and unit cost. Annual value and class fill in as you type. There is no need to pre-sort; the tool ranks by annual value for you.

Item name Annual demand
(units / year)
Unit cost
(₹ / unit)
Annual value
(₹ / year)
Class Remove row

Enter each item's annual demand and unit cost; annual value and ABC class are calculated automatically.

Total annual value: ₹9,63,600

Your class cut-offs

The lines are drawn on cumulative value, not on how many items you have. A items are the highest-value items up to the first cut-off; B items take you to the second; the rest are C. The 80 / 15 / 5 split is a common starting point; adjust it to where your own range changes character.

The highest-value items whose running total reaches this share of total annual value are Class A.
% of value
Items taking the running total from the A cut-off up to this figure are Class B. Everything beyond is Class C.
% of value

C items make up the remaining 5% of value. Both cut-offs are illustrative starting points, not asserted benchmarks; set them from your own range.

Your value concentration, drawn to scale

A Pareto curve: items ranked from highest to lowest annual value along the horizontal axis, with cumulative share of total value rising up the vertical axis. Shaded bands mark the A, B and C classes at the cut-offs you set. Cumulative % of annual value Items, ranked by annual value (highest first)

Each point is one item, ranked from your highest annual value on the left to the lowest on the right; the line climbs to show how quickly cumulative value adds up. A curve that shoots up steeply and then flattens means a few items carry most of the value: the classic ABC picture. The shaded bands are the A, B and C cut-offs you set.

Class A

1 item

77% of value · 20% of items

Class B

1 item

17% of value · 20% of items

Class C

3 items

6% of value · 60% of items

Where these numbers come from, and how to read them

The method

ABC classification is a ranking, not a formula you plug numbers into. Each item's annual value is the one calculation:

Annual value = annual demand × unit cost
Rank all items by annual value, highest first
Add the values up cumulatively, as a % of the total

Once every item has an annual value, you sort the whole range from highest to lowest and keep a running total of value as a percentage. The items that carry you up to the first cut-off (80% of total value by default) are your A items. The items that take the running total from there to the second cut-off, 95% by default, are B items. Whatever is left, the long tail that makes up the last few per cent of value, is C.

Why value, not price or quantity

It is the annual value that decides the class, because that is what actually ties up money and risk across a year. A cheap fastener you consume by the lakh can carry more annual value than a costly machine part you buy twice a year. Ranking on unit cost alone would over-weight expensive rarities; ranking on quantity alone would over-weight cheap high-volume items. Multiplying the two puts each item where its real financial weight belongs.

Why the cut-offs are yours to set

The 80 / 15 / 5 split echoes the Pareto idea that a small share of items usually accounts for most of the value, and it is a reasonable place to start. But how concentrated your range really is depends on what you stock. A range dominated by one or two big items will show almost all its value in a very steep first climb; a flat, even range will barely bend. That is why this tool lets you move both lines, and why it does not assert an outside benchmark: set the A line where the vital few clearly end, and read the split against your own operation.

What to do with the classes

The point of the split is to stop treating every item the same. A items earn the tightest control: frequent review, accurate forecasts, a properly calculated economic order quantity, and a service-level-based safety stock and reorder point. B items get standard periodic control. C items are deliberately kept simple: bulk orders, a generous buffer, and no fine-tuning, because the money at stake does not repay the planning time. Re-rank every quarter or so, since demand and costs move and items drift between classes.

Terms used on this page

Annual value
An item's annual demand multiplied by its unit cost: what the item represents in money over a year, and the basis for the ranking.
Cumulative value
The running total of annual value as you go down the ranked list, usually read as a percentage of the total. The class cut-offs are drawn on this, not on item count.
Pareto principle
The general observation that a small share of causes accounts for most of an effect; here, that a few items usually carry most of the inventory value.
Vital few / trivial many
The A items that carry most of the value and are worth the tightest control, versus the C items whose combined value is small enough that simple rules are good enough.

Common questions

What is ABC classification?

ABC classification is a way of sorting your inventory items by how much money each one represents in a year, so you can give the most control to the items that matter most. Each item's annual value is its annual demand multiplied by its unit cost. You rank every item from highest annual value to lowest, add the values up as you go, and draw two lines: the items that together make up the top slice of total value are your A items, the next slice are B items, and the long tail of low-value items are C items. It is the inventory version of the idea that a small number of items usually account for most of the value.

How is each item's annual value worked out?

Annual value is annual demand multiplied by unit cost. If you use two thousand units of a part in a year and each one costs forty rupees, that item's annual value is eighty thousand rupees. It is the annual value that decides the class, not the unit cost on its own and not the quantity on its own. A cheap item you use in huge volumes can easily out-rank an expensive item you buy once or twice a year, which is exactly why the ranking is done on the two multiplied together.

What do the A, B and C cut-offs mean?

The cut-offs are cumulative-value lines, not counts of items. With the common eighty-fifteen-five split, A items are the highest-value items that together make up the first eighty per cent of total annual value, B items are the ones that take you from eighty up to ninety-five per cent, and C items are the remaining five per cent of value spread across the long tail. The percentages are of value, not of item count; a handful of A items can carry eighty per cent of the money while the many C items carry very little. The split is adjustable here because the right lines depend on your range; the eighty-fifteen-five figures are a widely used starting point, not a rule.

What should I actually do differently for A, B and C items?

A items earn the tightest control: frequent review, accurate forecasts, close supplier relationships, and safety stock and reorder points that are calculated rather than guessed, because an error on these ties up the most cash or hurts service the most. B items get standard, periodic control: sensible rules that you review now and then. C items are deliberately kept simple: order them in bulk, hold a comfortable buffer, and do not spend scarce planning time fine-tuning them, because the money at stake does not repay the effort. The whole point of the split is to stop treating every item the same and to move attention to where the value is.

Do the classes have to be exactly 80, 15 and 5?

No. Eighty, fifteen and five are a familiar starting point, but the cut-offs are yours to set and this tool lets you change them. Some ranges are far more concentrated, where a very small number of items carry almost all the value, and some are much flatter. What matters is that the A band captures the vital few items worth the tightest control and the C band captures the trivial many that are not worth fine-tuning. Set the two lines where the jump in cumulative value tells you the character of your range changes, then read the split against your own operation.

How does ABC classification fit with my other inventory decisions?

ABC is the triage step that comes before the detailed work. Once you know which items are A, you know where to spend the effort of calculating a proper economic order quantity, a service-level-based safety stock, and a reorder point, and where a rough rule is good enough. It tells you where to point the other tools, not what number to set. A sensible routine is to re-rank your range every quarter or so, because demand and costs move, and an item can drift from C to A as its usage grows without anyone noticing until it is tying up real money.

Where to go next

This is your starting number, not your final answer. Validate the split against your own range, costs, and demand before you act on it.